Like a lot of bass anglers,
I was interested to read the other day that the Bassmaster Elite Series Rules
Committee has amended the regulations for anglers fishing in the upcoming Bassmaster
Classic and Elite Series, making it clear that only a single lure can be used during
practice and tournament competition.
The move is in obvious
response to Paul Elias' stunning victory at the recent 2011 FLW event on Lake Guntersville,
when he literally walked away from the rest of the field, thanks to the fact he
was the only angler using the until-then, unknown Alabama Rig, for the entire
tournament.
Since Elias won the event,
it is fair to say that demand for the umbrella rig has shot through the roof. Indeed, a friend who recently returned from a
trip to Guntersville reported that, "every angler I saw was throwing an
Alabama Rig."
The move by the Bassmaster
folks has certainly sparked plenty of healthy debate, and no shortage of
e-mails, asking what I thought of the rule change.
So, let me carefully put my
toe into the water and offer a few thoughts.
First, if the one-rod, one-line,
one-lure rule is supported by the majority of anglers fishing the Bassmaster
Elite series, as it seems to be, then that is the way it should be. It is absolutely no different, in my mind, from
the rule the Bassmaster folks have on the books restricting tournament anglers
from using the main motor to assist in manipulating the bait.
So, in addition to not
being able to "troll", anglers are also now restricted from throwing
tandem fluke-rigs or two top water frogs as previously has been the case.
Ditto, using a jig instead
of a weight to anchor a drop-shot rig.
Which brings us to the
question of ethics and whether or not the Alabama - and similar rigs - should be
banned outright.
The easiest way to answer
that question, I think, is to ask yourself this: "If banning the Alabama rig is the
solution, what is the problem?"
Based on Elias' showing at Guntersville,
many anglers are suggesting it is a matter of conservation. That the rig is so effective, there won't be
any fish left in the lakes.
When I read and heard that
argument, I couldn't help thinking back, far too many years than I wanted, to when
the first buzzbaits appeared on the scene.
It was impossible back then not to catch fish throwing the crazy
things. But, then the action, as so
often happens, waned.
So many anglers threw so
many buzzbaits that the fish were bombarded and became conditioned to
them. And while buzzbaits remain a good
option when conditions are "right", I have to scratch my head to recall
a recent major tournament that was won by an angler throwing a buzzbait.
Ditto, Sluggos.
I'll never forget when
Sluggo's first appeared and Bob and Wayne Izumi and I had them a year or so in
advance of most other anglers.
Bob and I were practicing
for a big event back then, following several other boats down a shoreline. No matter where we threw those silly Sluggos,
a bass scooted from out of nowhere, grabbed onto the soft plastic bait and
would not let go of it.
It was silly.
A year or so later, I went
down and fished the Bassmaster Top 100 event on Minnesota's Lake Minnetonka and
lead the co-angler side on Day 1 and 2, eventually finishing third. I practiced for that event one day with buddy
and Connecticut
bass pro Terry Backsay. Terry had made a
big name for himself in his rookie season, making it to the Bassmaster Classic
and placing high in nearly every event he fished, throwing Sluggos almost
exclusively.
I'll never forget going
down one row of docks on Minnetonka
in practice, throwing Sluggos, and it was brutal because the bass wouldn't let
go of Terry's and my bait. We'd pitch
the soft plastic lure into a boat slip, let it settle to the bottom, tighten up
on the line and there would be a bass hanging onto it more times than not. We had our hooks bent back so we didn't stick
any of the fish in practice, and many times we'd drag the bass right to the
side of the boat before it finally let go. Several times, the fish swallowed the baits!
Yet, Sluggo's too, quickly
became passé.
Indeed, when was the last
time a major tournament was won by an angler throwing a Sluggo? It is still a great lure, but ......
My sense is we're going to
see the same thing happen with the Alabama
rig, especially since so many anglers are going to be throwing the rigs this
season. Indeed, it will be fascinating to
see how long it takes, before the shine starts to tarnish.
Something else to think
about: in Ontario and most Canadian provinces you're
allowed to have four (4) hook points on your main line, a treble hook counting
as one "hook point".
This means it is legal for
anglers to use "pickerel rigs" sporting four single hooks, each baited
with a live minnow, leech, or nightcrawler.
So, what is it more "ethical" or "unethical" - four
live baits dangling from a single line, or four soft plastic lures?
Indeed, gun advocates are
fond of suggesting that, "guns don't kill people, other people kill
people".
And so it is with fishing
lures.
I mean, how can catching
and releasing a bass on an Alabama rig be called "unethical", while
catching and killing the fish on a lure sporting a single hook is somehow "right"?
Hmmmm .......
To cloud the "ethical
issue" even further, the Bassmaster folks still use the outdated, "dry"
weigh in method, as opposed to the "water weigh-in" system, that all
credible science shows to be much more fish friendly.
Indeed, the ground breaking
research carried out by fish physiologists like Dr. Bruce Tufts of Queen's
University clearly shows that taking fish out of water and weighing them in a
dry basket to be extremely stressful, even lethal. Yet, the dry system is the method Bassmaster
continues to employ.
Which means, you can't use
an Alabama
rig to catch a fish in the Bassmaster Classic or any of the Bassmaster Elite
Series events that use the outdated, antiquated, dry basket weigh-in procedure. But, you can use the Alabama rig in FLW events that employ the state-of-the-art,
fish friendly, water weight in system.
Go figure.
But, that is the problem
with ethics. They keep getting in the
way!